22 November 2011 - territory dispute

< yesterday -- tomorrow >

When two nations have a territorial dispute, why do we ask them to solve it by negotiation? Territory is emotional, so neither side ever makes a serious offer and the dispute can’t stop. Well, negotiation beats fighting, but surely there should be a formal mechanism. I propose that every claimant to territory controlled by another must deposit the territory’s selling price with the United Nations, or else the claim will not be acknowledged by other nations. If negotiations have not succeeded after fifteen years, all claimants lose their deposits and the UN renders the territory unusable by seeding it from the air with strontium-90.

clue:

One side has possession and one or more other sides have claims, so any imposed solution has to be enforceable over the objections of the possessor. But any agreed solution has to leave no claims behind, and why would a nation give up a claim that costs nothing to make?

give me a clue so sweet and true

the Daily Whale || copyright 2011, 2024 Jay J.P. Scott <jay@satirist.org>