archive by month
Skip to content

Elo rating table

Here’s a table that explains what Elo ratings mean. To find out the chance that one bot will beat another, subtract their Elo ratings and look up the difference in the table. Iron is rated 2081 and Wulibot is rated 1871. The difference is 210—look it up in the table!

The probability estimate is not perfect, but it is good on average.

rating
diff
win %rating
diff
win %rating
diff
win %rating
diff
win %
050% 20076% 40091% 60097%
1051% 21077% 41091% 61097%
2053% 22078% 42092% 62097%
3054% 23079% 43092% 63097%
4056% 24080% 44093% 64098%
5057% 25081% 45093% 65098%
6059% 26082% 46093% 66098%
7060% 27083% 47094% 67098%
8061% 28083% 48094% 68098%
9063% 29084% 49094% 69098%
10064% 30085% 50095% 70098%
11065% 31086% 51095% 71098%
12067% 32086% 52095% 72098%
13068% 33087% 53095% 73099%
14069% 34088% 54096% 74099%
15070% 35088% 55096% 75099%
16072% 36089% 56096% 76099%
17073% 37089% 57096% 77099%
18074% 38090% 58097% 78099%
19075% 39090% 59097% 79099%
20076% 40091% 60097% 80099%

Trackbacks

No Trackbacks

Comments

krasi0 on :

In the case of bots playing the percentages are expected to be even more accurate since bots never get sick or tired which in the case of human players might affect their performance. OTOH, some bots like to experiment with more than one BO, so you never know what's going to happen.

imp on :

when reasoning about average win percentage effects like humans being sick do not distort the rating, because a human who is more likely to be sick actually should have a lower rating.
Translating to bots, as long as a bot experiments with more than one BO consistently (and won't alter the likelihood to do so based on learning), then it will also yield the correct rating.
For humans and for bots holds: the average elo rating does not reflect the true average strength only when the subject is currently in a phase of improvement or getting worse. In theory a player can take advantage of this fact by mostly playing against declining players and avoiding rising players.

Jay Scott on :

What you say is mathematically true, given enough data and a small enough K factor in the Elo formula, neither of which is the case in reality. :-) Even so, real ratings are quite accurate on average.

Add Comment

E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications.

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

Form options

Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.