archive by month
Skip to content

AIIDE 2017 outlook

AIIDE submission closes after today. Some bots may yet withdraw at the last moment or otherwise disappear, but we pretty much know the roster. I want to look ahead with the information we have.

race distribution

This year we have a zerg plurality. That happens to be good for Steamhammer, because ZvZ is Steamhammer’s best matchup.

race#%
terran721%
protoss1031%
zerg1443%
random13%

The percentages add up to 98% instead of 100% due to rounding.

BWAPI versions

I was surprised how many bots were already on BWAPI 4.2.0.

BWAPI#%
3.7.4928%
4.1.21753%
4.2.0618%

The 2 bots listed as withdrawn were also on BWAPI 4.2.0. Does anybody know if or when SSCAIT will support the newer version? I know resources are limited, so I won’t be surprised if it takes time.

6 of the 9 bots still on BWAPI 3.7.4 are the legacy bots carried over from last year. Only 3 are active entrants. Surprisingly, one of the 3 is ForceBot, which seems to be a recent bot since it only recently appeared on SSCAIT and suffered some teething troubles there.

the newcomers

There are unusually many absolute newcomers, bots whose names or authors I don’t recognize. History says that most newcomers will do poorly; it takes a long time to turn an empty repository into a contender. But there are exceptions. This year PurpleWave reached #3 in CIG 2017. Last year Bereaver was a sensation. It will be a surprise if an unknown wins—but surprises happen.

  • bonjwAI
  • CherryPi
  • cpac
  • DeepTerran
  • HOLD
  • Inspir
  • Myscbot
  • Sling

I think many are especially looking forward to the Facebook entry CherryPi by old hand Gabriel Synnaeve. I’ve read the papers, and my hopes are not high. My impression is that the project is not far along. I expect CherryPi to finish in the lower half, and I mainly hope that it will show some interesting behaviors along the way.

the unpredictable

A few bots are both potential top finishers and potential also-rans. Arrakhammer and McRave have shown inconsistent results, strong play when in their best form but many losses when problems creep into the codebase. AILien was often impressive on SSCAIT, but stopped playing there after updating to BWAPI 4.2.0. I don’t know what updates it may have seen since.

the known contenders

Iron is of course the favorite. In CIG, Iron suffered because it was unready for the new and troublesome maps. In AIIDE, the maps are standard and are the same as last year. I see a strong chance that Iron will pull in well ahead.

Bots that are likely to finish high are LetaBot, Microwave, PurpleWave, Steamhammer, UAlbertaBot, and ZZZKBot. ZZZKBot won CIG 2017 and is a perpetual contender. This tournament has more new bots than CIG, which favors ZZZKBot’s exceptionally well-implemented 4 pool—it smashes opponents which are not perfectly prepared. ZZZKBot is my pick as the most likely #2 finisher. Beyond that, it gets harder for me to forecast.

Steamhammer I think is likely to finish fairly high, but outside the top 3. It will lose almost all games versus Iron and PurpleWave, and some versus UAlbertaBot (which I expect to be stronger with the new SparCraft). Without opponent modeling and unable to adjust its strategy mixes, Steamhammer is also at risk of losing many games to newcomer bots. I see the opponent model as a necessary feature for a tournament, because unknown opponents might do anything, and known opponents might have surprises in hand.

But really, we don’t know. The tournament exists to find out.

Update: The roster page now says that 4 of the newcomer bots, plus AILien, either withdrew or did not submit. 27 contenders remain.

Update 2: Now AILien is listed as submitted after all. Whew.

Trackbacks

No Trackbacks

Comments

LetaBot on :

Since tscmoo is also on the FaceBook team, they could implement the techniques developed/learned in TorchCraft into tscmooZ


That way you could get a solid bot.

McRave on :

Like Iron, McRave strictly uses BWEM and unfortunately has the same map issues. I feel our results at CIG are skewed due to that, but that only pressures BWEM to improve!

MicroDK on :

I believe McRave will do much better in AIIDE... the bot is in good shape on SSCAIT so I think it will end in the top 5. - I don't know if the recently added lurkers openings and zergling rush worker defense will make Microwave much better... hopefully it will make it's ZvZ play better. I had plans for more features (Guardians, using FAP to decide units mix) but testing takes so long time and I did not want to break anything important. My best guess is that Microwave will end somewhere in the middle of the list... time will tell. - My guess for top 3: Iron, McRave, Steamhammer. Important outsiders: PurpleWave, Arrakhammer, AILien. The authors of those bots tend to try new ideas and if they pull it off without bugs they will succeed. I dont know any of the new bots, but a couple of them could surprise.

Andrey Kurdyumov on :

Looking for other post, where you told that FAP replaced with SparCraft, found this one. Right now interesting to compare predictions with actual results.
CherriPi actually win, PurpleWave does not participate. Letabot perform not so well.
UAlbertaBot *almost* go into elimination bracket.
krasi0 does not participate, looks like he could win tournament after all.

Jay Scott on :

Are you confusing AIIDE with SSCAIT?

Andrey Kurdyumov on :

Probably. I could. And what even more confuses me, is name of bots and their writers :) Sorry for necro posting.

Jay Scott on :

Ha ha! As far as I am concerned, every topic is still alive!

Add Comment

E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications.

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

Form options

Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.